Attention! This is archive version of the site. New website of MAMA-86 NGO is HERE
“Kyiv-2003” ProjectThe Fifth Ministerial Conference “Environment for Europe” took place in May 2003. With a purpose of preparation of Ukrainian public for this event, in particular raising awareness and understanding of the issues that will be discussed at the Conference, All-Ukrainian Environmental NGO “MAMA-86” in cooperation with All-Ukrainian Coalition of Environmental NGOs “Alter-Eco” and Stakeholder Forum for Our Common Future (UK) with financial contribution of Community Fund implemented “Kyiv-2003” Project. Participation in the “Kyiv-2003” project was the right opportunity for Ukrainian NGOs and public concerned over its future to take part in development of pan-European environmental policy. The network of 56 environmental NGOs that represent all regions of Ukraine was established under “Kyiv-2003” Project. “MAMA-86-Kyiv” and five regional coordinators managed activity of the local project partners. Goal:
Mainstreaming Project Activity:
Project results 1. Raising Awareness of the “Environment for Europe” Process and the Kyiv Conference Informational campaign was the main project element. Information, that was important and, at the same time, difficult, mixed with professional terms, stated in scientific or legal manner, was over-interpreted, adapted, commented and then transferred at the local level in the workshops, trainings, lectures, project bulletin and web-site. The wide information dissemination was fostered by a campaign for mass media involvement to cover the progress in preparation for the Kyiv Conference, as launched by the project partners. Due to this event, around 100 articles, 10 TV programmes and 25 radio broadcasts were in place that highlighted the specific agenda items of the Kyiv Conference, its significance on the European scale and for Ukraine, in particular. 2. Ensuring Participation in Decision-Making In addition to raising awareness of the project partners and public, we also collected, analysed, and processed information and opinions of public, NGOs, scientists and experts as well as promoted transferring of these facts, suggestions, opinions, and analysis to the working groups, which worked on development of the Conference documents and to other executives bodies. Due to the project activities, its partners could enforce their right of participation in the environmental decision-making internationally. The most evident example is involvement of a wide range of interested organisations in discussing of the draft Carpathian Convention. As a result, numerous comments and proposals were taken into account while drawing up the Carpathian Convention that was signed at the Kyiv conference. The fruitful activity of regional partners from the Western project region, coordinated by Yu. Vassidlov (Association “Nash Dim”), showed that willingness, professionalism and diligent work were the key factors for enforcing the right of participation in decision-making on condition that relevant governmental authorities, certainly, were willing to co-operate. 3. Capacity Building of Project Network Branches The NGOs, involved in the project activities, had opportunities for:
4. Clarifying the Right of Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making, Access to Justice in Environmental Matters A good deal of articles of Information-analytical bulletin “Kyiv-2003” were dedicated to clarification of fundamental rights enshrined in the Aarhus Convention. Participants of the regional workshops regularly shared their experience in implementing the Convention provisions, while the experts provided comments and advice regarding this issue. Taking into account importance of dissemination of information on environmental rights among the public, project team conducted training for regional and national mass media. Journalists could obtain the exhaustive information about these rights directly from the high-skilled environmental lawyers; learn about cases of implementing this regulatory act in practice. In general, the project was a real training ground, on which the theory and practice of the Aarhus Convention implementation in Ukraine was testing during more than one year under difficult conditions of formation of real openness and democracy.
|
|||||||||